![]() Version 2.0 of the test performs the best part of two-dozen compute related tasks, such as regular expressions, cryptography, ray tracing, emulation, and Navier-Stokes physics calculations. We report this final score.Ī popular web test for several years, but now no longer being updated, is Octane, developed by Google. Our test goes through the list of frameworks, and produces a final score indicative of ‘rpm’, one of the benchmarks internal metrics. ![]() All the frameworks implement the same visual cues, but obviously apply them from different coding angles. Our newest web test is Speedometer 2, which is a accrued test over a series of javascript frameworks to do three simple things: built a list, enable each item in the list, and remove the list. We repeat the whole thing four times, and average those final scores. Similar to WebXPRT3, the main benchmark is a sectional run repeated seven times, with a final score. This leaves a lot of applications as ‘fixed-in-time’, and relevant to user experience for many years. Web framework development is often very quick but with high turnover, meaning that frameworks are quickly developed, built-upon, used, and then developers move on to the next, and adjusting an application to a new framework is a difficult arduous task, especially with rapid development cycles. This is still a relevant test, especially for users interacting with not-the-latest web applications in the market, of which there are a lot. The older version of WebXPRT is the 2015 edition, which focuses on a slightly different set of web technologies and frameworks that are in use today. WebXPRT 2015: HTML5 and Javascript Web UX Testing ![]() We run this standard test four times, and take an average. This latest test (as we started the suite) has built upon and developed the ethos of previous tests: user interaction, office compute, graph generation, list sorting, HTML5, image manipulation, and even goes as far as some AI testing.įor our benchmark, we run the standard test which goes through the benchmark list seven times and provides a final result. The company behind the XPRT test suites, Principled Technologies, has recently released the latest web-test, and rather than attach a year to the name have just called it ‘3’. WebXPRT 3: Modern Real-World Web Tasks, including AI We have also included our legacy benchmarks in this section, representing a stack of older code for popular benchmarks.Īll of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench. Our web tests include some of the industry standard tests, as well as a few popular but older tests. ![]() Despite this, web tests are often a good measure of user experience: a lot of what most office work is today revolves around web applications, particularly email and office apps, but also interfaces and development environments. The fast paced nature of browser development means that version numbers (and performance) can change from week to week. Modern web browsers are frequently updated, with no recourse to disable those updates, and as such there is difficulty in keeping a common platform. While more the focus of low-end and small form factor systems, web-based benchmarks are notoriously difficult to standardize.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |